Debate on WR

Debate on World Relations (WR) against International Relations (IR) is a serial of debate in academical among the Indonesian scholars who concern about the development of how the Indonesian Scholars see the world (worldview) in many ways. In this case the “Mazhab Indonesia (Manunggalism): Indonesian School of World Relations” come up as a New Grand Paradigm, Philosophy, and Theory in understanding a World Relations in Manunggalian Era.

Manunggalism is a Grand Paradigm, Philosophy, and Theory in how to see the world order (worldview) in Manunggalian Era (Era Pemurnian) by using the “Gotong Royong as a World Relations System” belong to “Mazhab Indonesia (Manunggalism): Indonesian School of World Relations” goes beyond the “Indonesian School of International Relations”. Manunggalism is the way of the Eastern world to see the world, and Manunggalistiwa has the position of being a world line-judge between the two world age forces: the Eastern world (Manunggal) and Western world (Atlantikal).

The topics of debate is going to the reorganization of the world into 8 (eight) parts, namely history, civilization, culture, tradition, philosophy, ideology, social, and human nature system. So, “Mazhab Indonesia (Manunggalism): Indonesian School of World Relations” suggesting three questions to be debated among the scholars: What is the World Relations System that more suitable in understanding of the world relations today? What is the World Relations Structure that more suitable in understanding of the world relations today? What is the World Relations Polarism that more suitable in understanding of the world relations today?